Effingham’s June 13 hearing revealed what the Planning Board has been missing for the past two years.
Effingham’s June 13 hearing revealed what the Planning Board has been missing for the past two years.
The board has a legal responsibility to protect the public by making a reasonable and lawful decision based on facts—all of the facts.
After his credibility is questioned, the geoscientist identifies four critical ways in which the plan fails to protect the public’s health, safety and welfare.
The developer calls it the “best” plan. Critics promise a rebuttal.
The “discontinued use” issue is taken off the table at the last minute, even as the applicant and the town agree on a key point.